Re: [OPE-L] gen equ and sraffa

From: glevy@PRATT.EDU
Date: Thu Oct 25 2007 - 16:42:02 EDT

Next message: Gary Mongiovi: "Re: [OPE-L] Incoherence of the TSSI - consensus?"
Previous message: glevy@PRATT.EDU: "Re: [OPE-L] gen equ and sraffa"
In reply to: glevy@PRATT.EDU: "Re: [OPE-L] gen equ and sraffa"
Next in thread: David Laibman: "Re: [OPE-L] gen equ and sraffa"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

>> I personally find PoCbmoC very autistic, not that impressing.
> I'm assuming that this is a translation issue: right?
> Rather than autistic (see e.g. <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Autistic>),
> what word did you intend to write?

OK. I think I get it: "Autistic" in comparison to "Post-Autistic".
I think I agree with others, though, that it's a "dreadful label":
see discussion at <http://divisionoflabour.com/archives/002341.php>.

In solidarity, Jerry

Next message: Gary Mongiovi: "Re: [OPE-L] Incoherence of the TSSI - consensus?"
Previous message: glevy@PRATT.EDU: "Re: [OPE-L] gen equ and sraffa"
In reply to: glevy@PRATT.EDU: "Re: [OPE-L] gen equ and sraffa"
Next in thread: David Laibman: "Re: [OPE-L] gen equ and sraffa"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Oct 31 2007 - 00:00:20 EDT