Re: [OPE-L] glossary for V1 of _Capital

From: Paul Zarembka (zarembka@BUFFALO.EDU)
Date: Wed Jan 09 2008 - 09:53:23 EST

Next message: Paul Zarembka: "[OPE-L] "Accumulation of Capital""
Previous message: GERALD LEVY: "Re: [OPE-L] glossary for V1 of _Capital"
In reply to: Dave Zachariah: "Re: [OPE-L] glossary for V1 of _Capital"
Next in thread: Dave Zachariah: "Re: [OPE-L] glossary for V1 of _Capital"
Reply: Dave Zachariah: "Re: [OPE-L] glossary for V1 of _Capital"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

I don't think so but I suppose this is clear enough from my messages.  Paul

--On 1/9/2008 3:23 PM +0100 Dave Zachariah wrote:

> But if one says that capital *is* a relation, then "capital accumulation"
> --- by definition a quantitative process --- loses its meaning and Marxist
> economic theory will be obscured.
>




************************************************************************
(Vol.23) THE HIDDEN HISTORY OF 9-11-2001  --  U.S. softcover forthcoming
                               video summary at http://snowshoefilms.com
(Vol.24) TRANSITIONS IN LATIN AMERICA AND IN POLAND AND SYRIA
********************* http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/PZarembka

Next message: Paul Zarembka: "[OPE-L] "Accumulation of Capital""
Previous message: GERALD LEVY: "Re: [OPE-L] glossary for V1 of _Capital"
In reply to: Dave Zachariah: "Re: [OPE-L] glossary for V1 of _Capital"
Next in thread: Dave Zachariah: "Re: [OPE-L] glossary for V1 of _Capital"
Reply: Dave Zachariah: "Re: [OPE-L] glossary for V1 of _Capital"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Jan 31 2008 - 00:00:06 EST